Sunday, November 24, 2013

50 Yrs. Ago: TV’s 1st Live Murder


SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 1963 2013: On this day a half century ago, in the wake of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination, about all anyone could do was hunker down in front of their television set to mourn the tragic loss of this visionary leader. That’s precisely what I was doing.

And so, it was inevitable that I’d soon become an eyewitness to something no one, especially a youngster (I was 9 at the time), should’ve ever been forced to endure. My childhood innocence would soon be shot to hell.

My NBC affiliate, WWJ-TV Detroit, channel 4, was broadcasting the live, national feed; the network cameras set up in the basement of the Dallas, Texas municipal building; where the cops were in the process of transferring Lee Harvey Oswald from the city jail to the more “secure” county lockup facility. It didn’t take long before these lawmen had discovered exactly how flawed their game plan had been; i.e., how sloppy their efforts had been in securing the route taken. Maybe they just didn’t care what happened? Or was it more a matter of hoping someone would make “something” happen?

That “something” did happen. At 12:20 EST, I distinctly recall watching a man, wearing a hat and dark colored suit, emerge from the throng of reporters. He turned out to be some sort of self-appointed, one-man firing squad. For him, it was simply a matter of READY… AIM… FIRE!

Fire he did. Oswald dropped to the ground (subsequent replays from different cameras / camera angles as well as still photos showed the grimace of agony, which contorted his face). Then, before the flummoxed, incompetent cops had even begun to react, I had reacted. My first thought was, “Now what? Would someone else soon step out from the shadows to kill Ruby?” Was that the general MO of this locale or just some random, isolated incident?

True, if Oswald really had been guilty of the crime he was accused of, punishment was required. But, what the hell had happened to the concept of innocent until proven guilty? Of course, at that point, Ruby’s gunfire had made such a trial impossible. Nope, there could be no orderly, legal proceedings where, via the carefully presented testimony and examination of the forensics, we could’ve perhaps patched together what actually happened in Dealey Plaza on 11/22/1963?

Moreover, not everyone believes in the death penalty. Looking at this from a more evolved perspective, had the (then) 24-year-old Oswald gone to trial and been proven guilty, had he been serving a life sentence, he may’ve still been alive today. Even though it’s highly unlikely that he’d have ever taken the witness stand back in 1963/64, who knows? When an incarcerated man comes to the realization that he has fewer days ahead than those behind him, he sometimes softens into a what-do-I-have-to-lose, tell-all mood. And tell-all is exactly what we have needed for the past half century.

Of course, maybe there really was nothing for Oswald to tell?

Well, if anything positive emerged from this long, fifty years ago, blood splattered weekend, it has been my consequent attitude; i.e., my loathing of firearms (and all things related to them).

As for the flipped out flip side of “our” “civilization”; i.e., the others out there… WAY OUT THERE? Well, these are the ones who learned the exact opposite lesson. Their “role models” were / still are Oswald and Ruby. They got off on / still get off on a vigilante / Wild West / anything goes mindset where the sound of BANG… BANG… BANG is the soundtrack of their lives; the “music” that tops off their Top 40 Hit Parade; that “catchy tune” that plays over and over and over again in their warped minds.

Over the course of the past half-century, this foul ‘tude has had plenty of time to fester and devolve America into our present-day, lowercase america… A.K.A., a gun sick society seething with raw, insatiable bloodlust.


No comments:

Post a Comment